If, for example, coverage of schoolchildren increased from the current 5% to 20%, they predict it would reduce more deaths in the over-65 population than increasing their vaccination coverage from the current 68% to 90% (see graph).Of course, this could also be because of our preference for individual rather than communal solutions.
21 January 2005
ageism hurts us all
Censorship is an obvious example of this, but also our policy of prioritizing flu vaccines for the elderly (who are more vulnerable to flu) rather than kids in schools (where flu is mostly spread) ironically means more adult deaths from flu.
From a recent article in Science:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment